Sunday, July 31, 2011

Is it an indication of the current peer-review process?


The following news articles published last week are worth reading

1. Fraud case we might have seen coming (http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110728/full/news.2011.437.html)
2. Paper on genetics of longevity retracted (http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110721/full/news.2011.429.html)
3. Scientist in hot water over polar bears, Al Gore (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43933715/ns/us_news-environment/?gt1=43001)
4. Peer review in science can be improved, MPs report (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14314501)

Does this say anything about the current policies in science and research?

No comments:

Post a Comment